A Student Publication of the Isaac
and Mara Benmergui Torah Academy of Bergen County![]()
Parshat Vayechi
14 Tevet 5762 December
29, 2001
Vol.11 No.15![]()
In This Issue:
Rabbi Steven Prebor
David Gertler
Donny Manas
Zachary Rosenberg
Rabbi
Howard Jachter
|
This week’s issue has been sponsored by David Gertler in honor of Mr. Speiser, Coach Bobby Kaplan, Rabbis Jachter, Grumet, Prebor, Smilowitz, Solnica, Grossman, Weiner, Blackstein, Adler & Dr. Berman, as well as the editors of Torat Chaim, the Torah Publication of Bruriah and Rabbi Tzvi Pittinsky. |
A Time to Kill
by Rabbi Steven Prebor
On his
deathbed, Yaakov gives a final message to each of his sons. Throughout the
Berachot, Yaakov’s tone is primarily positive, but his statement to Shimon and
Levi is quite negative. He admonishes them for their violent behavior, and says
that he will divide them and spread them out, presumably to keep their anger in
check. The predominant view among the Meforshim is that the violent act
referred to by Yaakov is the massacre of the inhabitants of Shechem carried out
by Shimon and Levi. It would appear that Yaakov’s criticism is a fundamental
one, indicating his rejection of violence as a means to achieve justice.
However, if we look at other places in the Chumash, we see a very different
attitude emerge.
First of all, at the time of the Shechem incident, Yaakov himself (34:30) seems
more concerned with its practical implications than with its moral
implications. Aside from expressing concern about a possible attack from the
Canaani or Perizi, Yaakov does not censure Shimon and Levi. In addition, later
in the Torah, there are several clear indications of support for violence, even
extra-judicial violence, in order to keep law and order. In Sefer Bemidbar,
Pinchas is praised for killing Zimri and Kazbi while they were committing an
immoral act. At the end of Sefer Devarim, when Moshe is giving his Berachot to
the Shevatim in Parshat Vezot Haberacha, Moshe praises Shevet Levi for not
ignoring family members while keeping and guarding the Torah (Devarim 33:9).
Rashi quotes the Sifrei which explains that this is a reference to the fact that
the Leviim willingly executed fellow Jews for the Chet Haegel. Why, then does
Yaakov chastise Shimon and Levi on his deathbed?
What seems to emerge from these incidences of violence is a distinction between
violence for a just and moral cause and violence to defend the family or its
honor. Let us recall that the response of Shimon and Levi to Yaakov was,
“Should our sister be made into a harlot?” (34:31). Also, Yaakov focuses
not only on the violent tendencies of Shimon and Levi, but on the fact that they
are violent as brothers, saying “Shimon Velevi Achim” (49:5). The
Rashbam claims that the word “Mecheroteihem” in that Pasuk also refers to
brotherhood. Finally, let us recall the fact that Zimri ben Salu was a Nasi
of Shevet Shimon, and according to the Midrash he took Cazbi into his tent in
order to defy Moshe in defense of his constituents within Shevet Shimon, who
apparently were disproportionately involved in that sin. Pinchas is then
praised for using violence in order to defend Torah authority and what is
morally correct, especially in the face of such effrontery by Zimri on behalf of
his fellow family members, namely Shevet Shimon.
This then explains why Shevet Levi is praised by Moshe in his blessings for
placing moral correctness above family connections. Incidentally, Shimon is the
only Shevet that is totally excluded from Moshe’s blessings. Perhaps this is
because Shevet Shimon, represented by Zimri, does the exact opposite of what
Shevet Levi does. It seems that whereas Shevet Levi had been able to channel
its violent nature to the right cause, Shevet Shimon remained mired in the
approach to justice that Yaakov repudiated.
Yaakov was not worried about the violence itself, but its use to bolster the
family name and to defend the family honor. Perhaps that is why he expresses
fear of attack from the Canaani and Perizi. It is not the attack itself that
concerns him as much as his children’s venture into the lawless world of bloody
family feuds, where the focus is on turf and not on morals.
Opposites Combined
by David Gertler
The Berachot
that Yaakov gave his children can all be interpreted to show the development of
that son and the tribe they father. The most interesting of the Berachot is the
one given to both Shimon and Levi. The Beracha is as follows: “Shimon and Levi
are brothers; weapons of violence are their swords. Into their conspiracy do not
bring my soul, my honor shall not become one with their congregation; for in
anger they killed a man, and because they desired it they maimed an ox. Cursed
be their anger for it is fierce, and their wrath because it is cruel; I will
divide them within Jacob, and I will disperse them within Israel” (49:5-7). Let
us see what the Beracha means.
“Shimon and Levi are brothers.” They act together towards those they feel have
wronged them. For this reason Yosef put Shimon in prison when the other brothers
went back up to get Binyamin: leaving Shimon and Levi together posed a threat.
The Midrash states that although they acted as brothers towards Dina in Shechem,
they did not act like brothers towards Yosef when he was being sold to the
Yishmaelim.
“Weapons of violence are their swords.” This might refer to the killing of Kazbi
and Zimri, which was done by Pinchas, a descendant of Levi. Zimri was in fact
from the tribe of Shimon (see Rashi to 49:6). Pinchas killed Kazbi and Zimri due
to his zealousness and love for Hashem. This suggests that Levi had killed
Shechem for true intentions of love towards his sister, whereas Shimon did so
out of a desire for war. Thus, in the Pasuk regarding Dina, “Each man took his
sword” (34:25), one can explain that Shimon took his sword for destroying
Shechem and Levi took his sword for saving Dina. This idea can also be supported
from Rashi, who states that Shimon and Levi had a thrill for destruction that
they got from their uncle, Esav.
This is where the brotherhood part of the Beracha ends. The rest of the blessing
is a set of parallels, one side applying to Shimon and one side applying to
Levi. (The Netziv’s approach is contrary to this author’s, in that the only
similarity between Shimon and Levi was the sword; other comments made by the
Netziv in this place appear to be similar to this author’s. See Netziv’s
commentary to 49:5. Also, see Rav Yuval Sherlow’s essay in Alon Shevut 100,
where a similar idea is expressed.)
“Do not bring my soul into their conspiracy.” This refers to Shimon. Since
Shimon’s intentions in the Shechem episode were not pure, Yaakov did not want to
have any part of it. Kazbi who worshipped Baal and sinned with a Midianite
woman, also fits, as the Pasuk says that Midianim “shall not be brought (Lo Yavo)
into Hashem’s nation,” and here the language is, “do not bring (Al Tavo) my soul
into their conspiracy.”
“My honor shall not become one with their congregation (Kahalam).” The use of
the word Kahalam is similar to that used by Korach, a descendant of Levi “Kahalu
Al Moshe,” “and they gathered against Moshe” (Bemidbar 16:3). The idea is that
Hashem will not become part of a congregation that rebels. Rashi’s comments are
similar. However, this applies only to that section of the sons of Levi who try
to make themselves even more distinct. For that reason it says “their
congregation” and it does not say “them.”
“In anger they have killed a man.” It is hard to know if this verse was said
referring to Shechem, for there they killed the entire town and not simply one
man. However, assuming it is referring to Shechem, it might be explained by the
Pasuk in that episode that says they specifically killed Chamor and Shechem,
individually, by sword (34:26). This can be compared to how Bilam was killed (Bemidbar
Sinai 31:8).
“And because they desired it they maimed an ox.” This can be referring to either
of the cases we have been discussing: Shechem or Midian. If this verse is
referring to the sons of Levi, it could also be referring to Korbanot. This is
the first time we see a radical change in our perception of Shimon and Levi, not
only with regard to intent but a completely separate action. (Rashi’s comments
are that the ox refers to Yosef, who they tried to “maim.” However, this is
unsatisfying, as the Pasuk says that they successfully maimed the ox.)
“Cursed be their anger for it is fierce.” This refers to Shimon who did not stop
at killing only Shechem and Chamor but destroyed the entire city. (However one
will note that given the circumstance, and the goal of not selling their sisters
as Harlots, it was necasary for them to kill the entire town.)
“And their wrath because it is cruel.” This refers to Levi. The Gemara states
that it is commonly known that Kohanim in particular have short tempers. There
are stories about the Chafetz Chaim’s having to train himself not to get angry.
We see that Pinchas used this trait positively. However, their wrath is cruel
both to those who are the receivers of the wrath and to the Kohanim who get very
angry. It is cruel to others because they should not be victims of the wrath,
and it is cruel to them because it is very challenging to control it.
“I will divide them within Jacob.” This is refers to Shimon, whose portion of
land was “swallowed up” by that of Yehuda because Yehuda’s portion was so large
next to Shimon’s, which was very small (Yehoshua 19:1,9). The word divide is of
the same root as the word portion. Jacob here refers to Yehuda, as the Midrash
states that Yaakov’s descendants will not be known as sons of Reuven, rather as
sons of Yehuda (Yehudim).
“I will disperse them within Israel.” This refers to the Leviim, who were the
center of the camp in the desert. Their job was always at the center of the rest
of the tribes. In Eretz Yisrael they worked in Yerushalayim, which is the center
of the land. However, their actual territory was in various cities dispersed
across the land (Yehoshua 21:1-3).
Ultimately, Shimon was the first tribe to be lost, while the tribe of Levi is
still identifiable today. We see that when two people do the same action one can
be rewarded for doing a Mitzva while the other is punished for sinning. The
Gemara states that being born under certain stars will orient your personality.
However, one can use that orientation for good or for bad. One who born under a
violent sign can either become a Shochet like Levi or a killer like Shimon.
Working Without a Break
by Donny Manas
If you take a
look into the Sefer Torah you’ll find that there’s almost always a space between
one Parsha and another. Sometimes it's only a space of nine letters, while other
times it is more. However, if you take a look at Parshat Vayechi you’ll notice
that there is no space left between Vayigash and Vayechi (except for the
standard space of one letter between words). One Parsha seems to go right into
the other, without any space separating them. What happened to the space?
Rashi notes this problem and presents two answers. The first answer is that the
passing of Yaakov Avinu caused a closing of the eyes and hearts of the Bnai
Yisrael on account of the difficulties encountered in their slavery. This fact
is indicated by the Torah closing one Parsha with another.
Even though, as the Baalei Tosafot points out, the real tough times didn't start
till after the death of Yosef (and his brothers), yet, however minutely, the
enslavement had already begun with Yaakov's passing. True, the real difficult
times didn't start till much later, however the passing of Yaakov already
brought about a change of attitude towards the Bnai Yisrael. The enslavement had
already begun, even if only in a very small way. Even though the Bnai Yisrael
were being well paid for their work, their difficulties had already begun. At
first their pay would be excellent. They received high salaries. Yet slowly but
surely their pay became less and less until soon they were required to work for
nothing.
The Gemara explains how their enslavement started gradually. At the beginning it
was hardly noticeable. Then it became progressively worse and worse. Once
someone allows himself to be enslaved even in the slightest, chances are that he
will soon become entrapped more and more. Only Shevet Levi remained untouched by
the enslavement. Yet the consequences of enslavement are quite grave. It causes
our eyes and heart to stop operating properly. We don't see as we saw before.
Our heart is not as sensitive as it was before. There is suddenly a slackening
in our views and feelings. Our eyes no longer see what they should see. Our
heart no longer feels what it should feel. It's a sure sign that the hardships
of the Galut have encircled us.
The moment Yaakov passed away, doubts suddenly began to rise up between Yosef
and his brothers. They thought that perhaps now Yosef was going to even the
score with them for what they had done. Suspicions began to erupt. Doubts began
to be raised. There weren't the same feelings toward each other that had existed
while Yaakov was alive. Yosef once again tried to calm their doubts and tried to
cast away their suspicions against him. Yes, one saw at once the change of
heart. The enslavement began to take its toll, even if only in a minute way. It
may have been only a little bit, but it was like a crack in the ceiling which
would soon get progressively worse with the strength of the enslavement and the
passing of time.
The Parsha of Vayechi is closed which gives a casual hint that our own hearts
and eyes have become closed as well. We can see a poor man in terrible trouble
yet fail to help him. We can notice a person desperately in need, yet we may
just pass him by as if we couldn't care less. Our feelings towards our brothers
have become calloused. Our hearts and eyes have become closed to their cries.
We've become insensitive to their plight. We are so engrossed in our daily
business and totally enslaved to our work that we pay little attention to the
many people around us who need our help desperately.
Tens of thousands of Russian and Iranian immigrants need our help desperately,
yet we seem not to see or feel their plight. The Galut has taken its toll. The
Parshiot are closed, and therefore, so too are our eyes and hearts. No wonder
hate and jealousies have replaced care and love.
The only ones who remained untouched by the enslavement was Shevet Levi. They
did not allow themselves to be enslaved. They remained forever faithful to the
Torah. That's our only hope to overcome the onslaughts of the Galut.
Only
by learning the Torah and applying it can we open up our hearts and eyes to
what's happening around us.
From Snake to Lion
by Zachary Rosenberg
When Yaakov
gives Dan his Beracha, he says, “Dan will judge his people, and Bnai Yisrael
will be like one. Dan will be a snake by the path, that bites a horse’s heels
so its rider falls backward. For your Salvation do I long for
Hashem!”(Bereishit 49:16-18) What does Dan’s judging have to do with Bnai
Yisrael being “like one”? Why is Dan compared to a snake? Additionally, what
does “For your salvation do I long for Hashem” have to do with Dan?
To answer these questions, we need to look at other places in the Torah where
Dan is mentioned. In last week’s Parsha, Parshat Vayigash, we see that Dan had
only one son, Chushim. Making matters even more difficult, Chushim, according
to the Midrash, was blind. All other tribes have more sons and greater numbers
of people. In Sefer Bereishit, Dan looks like a dying Shevet. In Parshat
Pinchas, however, Dan was the second to largest Shevet with 64,600 (Bemidbar
26:43) men, a large number, without even including women and children. There,
Dan was thriving!
What happened? The tribe of Dan was in a tough position yet eventually achieved
greatness. The Shevet had an enormous range of experience, and, as a result,
were able to judge people fairly, and thereby unite them. At the time of
Yaakov’s Beracha, Dan was compared to a snake, because it was going through a
harsh test, one that it seemed more likely than not to fail, just as the snake
in the Gan Eden story fails. By the time we get to Moshe’s Beracha to Dan,
however, the image of the snake is gone. In this later Beracha, Moshe says,
“Dan is a lion cub, leaping forth...”(Devarim 33:22) At the end, Shevet Dan
passed its test to the fullest. Moshe emphasized the tribe’s great change by
using the image of a lion, a symbol of a large and powerful Shevet. Dan was and
will be able to unite Bnai Yisrael by using its judgment.
The
final phrase, “For your salvation do I long for Hashem,” exists as a Beracha
from Yaakov that Dan should be saved from being a “snake,” be able to pass the
test, and become the “lion.” This is the Beracha that Yaakov gave Dan. Yaakov
wanted Dan to survive and gave him the Beracha, and, in the end, Yaakov’s wishes
were granted.
Staff at time of publication:
Editors-in-Chief: Josh Dubin, David Gertler
Managing Editors: Yair Manas, Uriel Schechter
Publishing Manager: Zev Feigenbaum
Publication Editor: Ilan Tokayer
Business Manager: Yehuda Goldin
Staff: Noam Block, Ami Friedman, Shuky Gross, Simcha Haber, Oren Levy, Ari
Michael, Effie Richmond, Dani Shaffren, Sam Wiseman
Webmaster: Yisroel Ellman (whose fault it is that I had
to put this issue online!!!)
Faculty Advisor: Rabbi Howard Jachter
This publication contains Torah matter
and should be treated accordingly.